Sunday, 7 June 2026

THE ALBANIANS GOT IT RIGHT

 Western billionaires , and even the west in general , seem to think that everyone in the world needs their fucking bloodsoaked "investments" , because the world needs their shitty minimum waged jobs to survive , while the wealthy make mega-profits off of the people and where they live .

Well, they're saying fuck that in Albania . Kushner can go fuck himself and ruin his own country .

Albania’s ‘Flamingo Revolution’: The Anti-Kushner Protests Explained

Thousands of Albanians are protesting a Kushner-backed resort project. (Photo: video grab, social media. Design: Palestine Chronicle)
facebook sharing button Share
twitter sharing button Post
pinterest sharing button Pin
email sharing button Email
sharethis sharing button Share

By Romana Rubeo  

Thousands of Albanians are protesting a Kushner-backed resort project, linking environmental destruction, land rights and foreign influence.

Key Developments

  • Thousands have joined protests against a luxury resort project linked to Jared Kushner’s investment firm, Affinity Partners.
  • Environmental groups warn the development threatens protected ecosystems, including habitats used by flamingos, monk seals and migratory birds.
  • What began as an environmental campaign has evolved into a broader movement challenging government transparency, foreign investment and land rights.

Why Are Albanians Protesting?

The protests sweeping Albania over a proposed luxury resort backed by US President Donald Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, have exposed a deep rift between the country’s government and a rapidly growing, youth-led grassroots movement.

What began as an outcry by environmentalists over the destruction of a fragile Mediterranean ecosystem has quickly evolved into a broader national crisis involving issues of land rights, institutional transparency and the geopolitical implications of foreign-backed development.

The immediate trigger came when heavy machinery moved into the coastal region of Zvërnec, near Vlora, to begin groundwork for a luxury complex estimated to cost between $1.6 billion and $4 billion.

According to reporting by The Guardian and Politico, workers erected a concrete-based, barbed-wire fence around the site and brought in private security personnel. Local residents, fishermen and farmers complained that they were suddenly prevented from accessing public beaches and agricultural land.

The tensions escalated into confrontations that resulted in arrests and the imprisonment of a private security guard accused of assaulting a protester.

What is the Kushner Project?

The scale of the proposed development is unprecedented for Albania’s coastline.

Affinity Partners, the private equity firm founded by Jared Kushner, plans to construct thousands of hotel rooms and luxury villas on Sazan Island and along the nearby Zvërnec coastline.

The project encompasses Sazan Island, a former communist-era military base, and areas surrounding the Vjosa-Narta protected ecosystem.

Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama has strongly defended the investment, presenting it as a milestone in Albania’s economic development and its transition toward high-end tourism.

Rama has repeatedly stated that the project will proceed, arguing that Albania must remain open to international investment and avoid gaining a reputation for hostility toward foreign investors.

Why are Environmentalists Alarmed?

Environmental organizations argue that the project threatens one of the Mediterranean’s most sensitive ecological areas.

BirdLife International and Albanian conservation groups warn that the region serves as a habitat for more than 200 bird species, including flamingos and endangered Dalmatian pelicans.

The area is also one of the last remaining refuges for the critically endangered Mediterranean monk seal and includes wetlands, lagoons, dunes and coastal forests that environmentalists consider irreplaceable.

The flamingo has become the symbol of the movement, with protesters carrying inflatable flamingos and cardboard cut-outs during demonstrations in Tirana and other cities.

As a result, the movement has become popularly known as the “Flamingo Revolution.”

Why Has the Project Become Politically Controversial?

The controversy extends beyond environmental concerns. Critics accuse the government of advancing the project through legal and administrative changes that weakened protections for previously protected areas.

The dispute became even more contentious after Albania’s Special Anti-Corruption Structure (SPAK) opened an investigation into legislative amendments adopted in 2024 concerning protected lands and the legal status of properties connected to the project.

For opponents, the issue has become emblematic of broader concerns regarding governance, transparency and the relationship between political power and foreign capital.

Many protesters argue that local communities have been excluded from decision-making while powerful interests determine the future of publicly valued land.

What is the Israel Connection?

The project has drawn additional scrutiny because of Jared Kushner’s broader political and economic profile.

Investigative reporting has highlighted that Affinity Partners received major backing from Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund and has pursued investments linking American, Arab, and Israeli financial interests.

Observers have connected this investment strategy to the regional normalization framework associated with the Abraham Accords, which Kushner helped broker during Donald Trump’s first administration.

At the same time, claims circulated on Albanian social media alleging that the land had been sold directly to Israel. However, researchers and observers cited by Politico stressed that such allegations do not reflect the central demands of the protest movement.

According to experts monitoring the demonstrations, the overwhelming majority of protesters are focused on environmental protection, transparency, and land rights.

Why Did the Israel-Albania Match Become Part of the Story?

The protests reached a particularly tense moment on Wednesday evening, during an Albania-Israel football match held in Tirana. Thousands of demonstrators gathered near the prime minister’s office, only a few hundred meters from the national stadium where the match was taking place.

Authorities cited security concerns related to the match when imposing road closures and maintaining a heavy police presence around the area.

When protesters breached metal barricades, police responded with water cannons in scenes that quickly circulated across social media.

For many demonstrators, the juxtaposition of heavy security, water cannons and a major international sporting event reinforced perceptions that public concerns were being sidelined in favor of political and economic priorities.

What Happens Next?

Rama has offered to meet with protesters to discuss environmental concerns but has made clear that he has no intention of halting the project.

Activists have rejected compromise proposals, insisting that construction equipment be removed and damaged habitats restored before any discussions can take place.

Meanwhile, the movement continues to expand beyond Albania. Diaspora groups have organized demonstrations outside the European Parliament in Brussels and in cities including Berlin, Milan, Toronto, and New York.

What began as a dispute over a luxury resort has evolved into a broader debate about environmental protection, democratic accountability and the role of foreign capital in shaping Albania’s future.

(PC, Politico, The Guardian, TruthOut)

Saturday, 6 June 2026

DON'T CALL IT A COMEBACK

 Last night was AK-47's first show since I've been back , and the first one in a very long time . It's not a comeback , but more like pressing play again instead of pause.

We have Marc from Isolated Earthlings to thank for the opportunity , it being a celebration of his 50th birthday , with Big Rick providing pizza . SCOUB , Isolated Earthlings , and Brewtality all played and it was fucking awesome . I honestly doubted whether I'd have the stamina to make it all the way through , but we did it and I haven't felt so alive since I've been back . There was a lot of support and love in the room , and that's what pulled me through .
Gratitude and love to everyone who was there . If you missed it , there will definitely be a next time .



Thursday, 4 June 2026

PIGS ARE PIGS

 So , these female kkkops get sexually harassed and discriminated against on the job , and the idiot judge tells them to go through the pigs' union , where the alleged perpetrators of the offences have friends and are members of this same union ? Absolutely ignorant , but not really surprising .

B.C. Appeal Court dismisses female police officers' sexual harassment case

​​B.C.’s highest court upheld the decision that the proposed class action issues must be addressed via union grievance processes.
web1_06032026-vtc-news-vsun-police-harassment
Six officers who put their names forward as representative plaintiffs had asked B.C.’s highest court to overturn a B.C. Supreme Court ruling that filing grievances, not a lawsuit, was the legal way to settle their disputes against 13 municipalities and their police boards. BIV

Female police officers who hoped to fight a class-action lawsuit against B.C.’s municipal police forces for sexual harassment and discrimination must instead have complaints heard through their unions’ grievance process, the B.C. Court of Appeal has ruled.

Six officers who put their names forward as representative plaintiffs had asked B.C.’s highest court to overturn a B.C. Supreme Court ruling that filing grievances, not a lawsuit, was the legal way to settle their disputes against 13 municipalities and their police boards.

The plaintiffs are current and former officers, including Lauren Phillips, Anja Bergler, Helen Irvine, Cary Ryan, Ann-Sue Piper and one person whose identity is protected by court order on a related matter. Phillips was a former Victoria police officer, while Piper was with Central Saanich police.

They allege systemic gender and sexual orientation-based discrimination, harassment and bullying by officers and managers of all the police forces.

The proposed lawsuit alleged the agencies failed to prevent, investigate or remedy the behaviour.

They claim there was negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, intentional infliction of mental suffering, harassment, civil conspiracy, breach of privacy and violations of their rights under Section 15 of the Charter, according to the Appeal Court judgment.

The officers allege the lower court judge erred because he treated the class action as “legally irrelevant” and considered their dispute to be about “working conditions” under a collective agreement instead of a “systemic claim alleging institutional negligence and structural discrimination,” according to the Appeal Court judgment written by Chief Justice Leonard Marchand.

They said the Supreme Court judge failed to consider the “collective and system nature” of the allegations, he wrote.

Marchand wrote they made “compelling arguments” for a class-action lawsuit for their claim because they considered it more than a “mere … labour dispute,” but a failure by municipalities and police boards to prevent, investigate and fix a “poisoned police culture.”

The officers argued it’s “not just individual disputes about entitlements under collective agreements,” he said.

They say because of their “vulnerability as female police officers,” a class-action lawsuit was the only way to pursue their rights and ensure accountability, he said.

Despite these arguments, they overlooked the fact that the law gives arbitrators the exclusive jurisdiction over labour disputes under union contracts, Marchand said.

He wrote that lower court judge had ruled their complaints fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the grievance process and are therefore outside the court’s jurisdiction. The officers failed to identify where the lower court judge made an error in his judgment, Marchand wrote.

“I have nothing of significance to add to the judge’s careful analysis,” Marchand wrote. “I am in substantial agreement with it and would therefore dismiss the appeal.”

Marchand’s ruling was agreed to by the two other Appeal Court judges on the panel, Justice Harvey Groberman and Justice Joyce DeWitt-Van Oosten.

One of the plaintiffs, a former Vancouver police officer, previously said non-court options won’t provide the same protections to female officers who have been victimized at work.

Some of the plaintiffs, she said, have tried going through their unions and human resources departments, but those are made up of police officers, which can include an offender or the friend of an offender.

She said after labour arbitration or workers’ compensation proceedings, victims could still end up still having to work with their harassers.

— With files from The Canadian Press

Read more stories from the Vancouver Sun here.

Wednesday, 3 June 2026

WILL THIS BE ON MAJOR NETWORK NEWS ?

 Even though much of the western world still supports the fascist state of israel in deeds if not in words , some important advances have been made by Palestine , especially in the world of labour .
Don't underestimate the importance of these things . Without workers , nothing happens .


Tense Scenes in Geneva as Palestine Secures ILO Victory, Israeli Delegate Interrupted

A participant carries a Palestinian flag at the International Labour Conference in Geneva, where delegates voted to grant Palestine member-state privileges. (Photo: Social Media, via Al Mayadeen)
facebook sharing button Share
twitter sharing button Post
pinterest sharing button Pin
email sharing button Email
sharethis sharing button Share

By Palestine Chronicle Staff  

Palestine won overwhelming support at the International Labour Organization, defeating an Israeli-backed effort to revoke its expanded status.

Key Developments

  • Palestine secured 394 votes at the International Labour Conference, with only 17 countries voting against.
  • The conference rejected an Israeli-backed attempt to revoke Palestine’s status and participation rights within the ILO.
  • The vote builds on a 2025 decision upgrading Palestine from a national liberation movement to a non-member observer state.

Major Diplomatic Victory

Palestine scored a significant diplomatic victory on Wednesday after the International Labour Conference overwhelmingly rejected an Israeli-backed effort to reverse its status within the International Labour Organization (ILO).

The vote reaffirms the growing international recognition of Palestinian statehood and participation in multilateral institutions.

Meeting in Geneva during its 114th session, the conference voted by a margin of 394 votes in favor, 17 against and 42 abstentions to uphold Palestine’s standing and participation rights within the organization.

The vote represented a decisive defeat for an Israeli initiative, supported by the United States and Argentina, seeking to rescind the resolution that had granted Palestine observer-state status and expanded privileges within the ILO.

According to WAFA, the legal quorum stood at 296 votes, while only 206 votes were required for a majority, underscoring the scale of support Palestine received. Following the announcement of the results, delegates in the conference hall applauded, reflecting broad backing for the Palestinian position.

Tense Session in Geneva

The vote took place amid visible tensions inside the conference hall.

According to Al Mayadeen’s correspondent in Geneva, the Israeli delegation unsuccessfully sought a repeat of the vote after the result became clear.

The session also witnessed repeated interruptions during the Israeli delegate’s speech. Delegates reportedly protested by banging on tables and creating sustained noise inside the hall, expressing opposition to Israeli policies and solidarity with the Palestinian cause.

The scenes highlighted the increasingly difficult diplomatic environment Israel has faced in international forums since the start of the Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Building on Last Year’s Upgrade

The latest vote follows a landmark decision adopted by the ILO in June 2025.

At that time, the organization upgraded Palestine’s status from a designation dating back to the 1970s as a “national liberation movement” to that of a “non-member observer state.”

The move aligned the ILO with broader United Nations recognition frameworks already adopted by organizations such as UNESCO and the World Health Organization.

The upgrade granted Palestine expanded participation rights, including the ability to address agenda items, submit proposals, participate fully in meetings and nominate delegates to certain conference bodies beginning in 2026.

Palestinian officials described the measure as part of a broader effort to secure recognition and representation across international institutions despite the continued absence of full UN membership.

Diplomatic Campaign

Palestinian officials credited the result to months of diplomatic engagement.

Palestine’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Ambassador Ibrahim Khraishi, played a central role in mobilizing support through consultations with member states and diplomatic groups.

The 2025 resolution had received backing from the Arab Group, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and a broad coalition of countries including France, Spain, China and Switzerland.

At the time, Khraishi described the ILO decision as a direct response to efforts aimed at denying Palestinian statehood and self-determination.

Palestinian Reactions

The Secretary-General of the General Federation of Palestinian Trade Unions, Shaher Saad, welcomed Wednesday’s result as further evidence of Palestine’s growing standing within international institutions.

Saad said the vote demonstrated increasing international support for Palestinian rights and praised the joint efforts of Palestinian representatives from government, labor and employer organizations.

He also thanked Arab and international delegations that supported Palestine throughout the discussions and voting process.

According to Saad, the outcome shows that Palestine continues to achieve diplomatic and political gains despite the extraordinary circumstances facing the Palestinian people and workers.

(WAFA, Al Mayadeen, Anadolu, PC