Wednesday, 25 March 2026
I FORGOT
Tuesday, 24 March 2026
MUSIC
JUST WHEN YOU THOUGHT IT COULDN'T BE ANY MORE HEARTLESS
U.S. to halt HIV aid if Zambia won’t share mining wealth?
Memo for Secretary of State urges ‘massive’ aid cut to push Zambia to negotiate

U.S. Considers Withholding H.I.V. Aid Unless Zambia Expands Minerals Access
A draft State Department memo outlines ways the Trump administration may ratchet up pressure on the African country by ending health support “on a massive scale.”
The State Department is considering withholding lifesaving assistance to people with H.I.V. in Zambia as a negotiating tactic to force the government of the southern African country to sign a deal giving the United States more access to its critical minerals.
“We will only secure our priorities by demonstrating willingness to publicly take support away from Zambia on a massive scale,” a draft of a memo prepared for Secretary of State Marco Rubio by the department’s Africa Bureau staff says. A copy of the memo was obtained by The New York Times.
Some 1.3 million people in Zambia rely on daily H.I.V. treatment that is provided through the decades-old U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (known as PEPFAR) and on tuberculosis and malaria medications that save tens of thousands of Zambian lives each year. The Trump administration is considering whether to “significantly cut assistance” as soon as May, to increase pressure on Zambia, the memo says.
In the wake of the Trump administration’s broad cut to foreign aid last year, the State Department has been pushing countries to sign new agreements pledging to meet certain conditions to receive American funds. Twenty-four countries have signed agreements so far, worth a total of $20 billion in health aid over five years. In most cases the main requirement on the recipient country is that its government commit to increasing its own health spending.

While most countries have signed, Zimbabwe’s government recently walked away from negotiations, saying demands about data and biological sample sharing were an intolerable infringement on sovereignty. Activists in Kenya have taken that country’s deal to the courts over similar concerns.
Unlike the other agreements, which are limited to funding for health programs, the United States is trying to use the deal it is negotiating with Zambia to address a longtime source of frustration: what is sees as China’s unfettered access to the country’s mineral wealth. Zambia is one of the world’s major copper producers, and also has huge reserves of minerals like lithium and cobalt, all of which are key in the green energy transition.
While the terms of the deal have not been made public by either government, a draft of the health component seen by The Times says the United States proposes to give Zambia $1 billion in health funding over five years, if Zambia commits $340 million in new health spending of its own. This is less than half the amount of health assistance Zambia received before the Trump administration took office.
The second piece is an agreement on steps that would give American businesses more access to Zambia’s vast mineral deposits and, by extension, end what the United States sees as China’s preferential access to Zambian mines.
The third is a renegotiation of a contract with the Millennium Challenge Corporation, an American foreign assistance agency focused on economic governance. The original contract, signed in 2024, gave Zambia a $458 million grant to support its agricultural sector. The Trump administration wants it restructured to require regulatory changes in mining and other industries.
Zambia will need to agree to all three by May in order to keep a portion of the health aid it now receives through PEPFAR, the draft memo suggests.
The State Department declined to comment on the memo. Responding to questions from The Times, the department’s press office said by unsigned email that it would not comment “on purportedly leaked documents or on deliberative diplomatic discussions.” The draft memo was prepared by the Zambia desk in the Africa Bureau and circulated among, and approved by, a number of officials who are informing the American side of the negotiations.
Cornelius Mweetwa, Zambia’s minister of information and its chief government spokesman, declined to comment on the negotiations.
The Trump administration had expected Zambia to sign late last year, when other African countries were agreeing to contracts, and officials traveled from Washington to Lusaka, the Zambian capital, to try to close the deal.

The draft memo prepared for Mr. Rubio says that getting the agreement signed would involve “the potential use of sticks” and warned that Zambia could not be allowed to backtrack because other countries are watching.
If Zambia won’t sign, “sharp public cuts to American foreign assistance would significantly demonstrate to aid-receiving countries the seriousness of our interest in collaboration and our insistence on tangible benefits under our America First foreign policy,” the draft memo says.
Zambia has been one of the largest recipients of PEPFAR assistance — more than $6 billion — in the past two decades. When the assistance began, during the administration of George W. Bush, some 90,000 people a year were dying of H.I.V. in Zambia and the health system was entirely overwhelmed.
The Zambian government has been taking over some of the H.I.V. programs since the Trump administration’s cuts to aid began last year. Nevertheless, everything from the essential medicines supply chain to the medications that stop babies from being infected with H.I.V. at birth still relies on American financial and logistical support.
The Trump administration has already wielded a heavy cudgel to advance the talks, according to the memo.
In December, the United States suspended the health funding talks when Zambia wasn’t engaging on the minerals issue, the memo says.
“At every point in the negotiation, we communicated what the G.R.Z. would lose if they failed to act,” the memo says, using an acronym for Government of the Republic of Zambia. “Repeatedly, we needed to threaten or actually withdraw assistance important to the GRZ to elicit progress on our priorities.”
More recently, the memo says, the State Department notified the Zambian government that it would cancel a planned deal that would have relieved Zambia of hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign debt payments, an amount roughly equivalent to half of what the country receives in health aid.
“Within days, the Zambian Mines Minister explicitly reversed course, telling USG officials the GRZ is amenable to negotiating preferential access, and the GRZ gave USG technical experts unprecedented access to their mining database,” the draft memo says.
Despite its extensive mineral wealth, and the longtime role of the United States as the country’s largest donor of foreign aid, there is only a limited presence of American companies in Zambia. Corruption levels are high — the official recently appointed by the president to lead a new anti-corruption effort was herself under investigation for graft — and the process of obtaining licenses and permits is onerous and convoluted.
Would-be investors from the United States, Canada and Europe have long complained that Chinese companies bribe senior officials to obtain mining licenses, and smuggle out much of what they produce without paying taxes, viewing the occasional small fine levied as a cost of doing business.
The proposed new bilateral compact would require Zambia to undertake significant reform of the governance of the minerals and other key sectors.

The draft memo notes that the health of Zambia’s democracy has frayed under President Hakainde Hichilema, and the silencing of opposition has limited the amount of public criticism. However, transparency and human rights organizations are using the country’s freedom of information system to try to make the proposed health agreement public.
They are chiefly concerned with a provision in the draft deal that requires Zambia to share its citizens’ health data with the United States for 10 years, although the United States pledges health funding for only five; and to share biological specimens collected through disease surveillance for 25 years, with no guarantee Zambia would have access to any product of research done with those samples, such as development of a vaccine.

Rumors about the negotiations have spread through Zambia, and they are wrenching for people dependent on the U.S.-supplied antiretroviral medications, or ARVs, they take each day.
“If they told me to be buying ARVs, the fifty kwacha, or a hundred, that’s four or five dollars per month, even three dollars, where am I going to get it?” asked Julius Kachidza, a 56-year-old advocate for people living with H.I.V. who lives in Chongwe, near the capital. “I barely eat a meal a day.”
Mr. Kachidza was diagnosed with H.I.V. in 2001, and was near death when he first got access to the drugs. His wife, who was also H.I.V.-positive, died 15 years ago. A son who was born with the virus is now in his 20s and also reliant on U.S.-financed medication.
“If this agreement is not signed, if the funding is not here for the next five years, government has got no capacity to respond to that immediate impact,” he said.
Perhaps, over five years, the government may successfully take over the program, but an abrupt slash in funds, like the country saw last year when the Trump administration took office, would be apocalyptic, he said. “It could be quite a disaster, especially to me. And the majority of people living with H.I.V. in Zambia.”
Monday, 23 March 2026
SAME SHIT SAME SYSTEM
Trump Immigrant Removals Now 10 Percent Below Biden’s Record
Published Mar 25, 2025
The Trump administration continues to conceal its actual record of enforcement actions. While initially daily numbers of ICE arrests were posted on social media, this practice stopped when arrest numbers began to fall.[1] As to Trump’s promised campaign of the mass removal of immigrants, to date no daily figures appear to have ever been released of the actual number of removals carried out by this administration.
The Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) published a report a month ago based on its analysis of figures that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had been publishing semi-monthly without fanfare for a number of years. ICE was and is currently required to publish these figures under provisions of the annual Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Acts Congress has passed. At the time of TRAC’s last report, the latest semi-monthly report published on February 14 contained figures current as of February 8, 2025. TRAC’s last report therefore tracked only the initial days of the new administration. Our report’s findings were titled: “Little Empirical Evidence That Arrests and Removals Are Higher Under Trump.”
Now a month later, ICE has published two new semi-monthly reports. Its latest report was published on March 14 and contained figures current as of March 8, 2025, a full month after our earlier report. Here we analyze these more recently posted numbers to assess how this administration’s record on arrests and removals now compares with that of former President Biden during his last full year in office (FY 2024).
ICE Average Daily Removals Continue To Fall
ICE removals in this semi-monthly series are tracked as a single cumulative number since the beginning of each fiscal year. Federal fiscal years begin in October and end the following year in September. Thus, FY 2025 began in October 2024 when President Biden was still in office. Further, these two-week reporting periods don’t slice January neatly at the point President Trump assumed office on January 20. The actual cumulative reporting period ended on January 25, 2025. Nonetheless by subtracting reported removals as of January 25 from those reported on each of the more recent reports, TRAC was able to derive the number of new removals that occurred every two weeks since then. These results are shown in Table A below. To facilitate comparisons, TRAC’s table also divides new removal numbers by the number of days covered to derive a daily removal average which can then be more easily compared with the daily average under President Biden for FY 2024.

The results are actually quite shocking. Despite deploying staff from other agencies to assist in enforcement activities and ordering active-duty military to facilitate removals at the border, daily removals have failed to reach even the levels achieved by the previous administration. Indeed, President Trump’s removal record is growing worse with time rather than improving.
As we noted in our initial report, Trump’s daily removals during the period of January 26-February 8 averaged just 693. This is 6.5 percent below the higher daily average of 742 under former President Biden. Now with an additional four weeks (28 days) added to the monitoring period, Trump’s daily removals for the period January 26 through March 8 averaged only 661 removals each day. This number is not only below its initial removal rate, but 10.9 percentage points lower than Biden’s daily average of 742 .
Details for each period in Table A also show that the higher initial numbers were followed by sharply lower daily numbers of just 600 during the middle of February suggesting that after this initial push, the administration was not able to sustain its level of removal activity.
| ICE Report Date* | Added Coverage Period | ICE Reported | TRAC Calculated | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumulative Immigrant Removals** | Change in Removals | Days in Period | Average/Day | ||
| FY 2024 | 271,484 | 366 | 742 | ||
| FY 2025: | |||||
| 2025-02-03 | Oct 1-Jan 25 | 85,769 | 85,769 | 117 | 733 |
| 2025-02-14 | Jan 26-Feb 8 | 95,474 | 9,705 | 14 | 693 |
| 2025-02-27** | Feb 9-22 | 103,868 | 8,394 | 14 | 600 |
| 2025-03-14 | Feb 23-March 8 | 113,541 | 9,673 | 14 | 691 |
| Trump Removals Jan 26 - March 8 | 27,772 | 42 | 661 | ||
| Change from Biden (FY 2024) | -10.9% | ||||
| ICE Report Date* | Coverage Period | ICE Bookins after Arrest | Days in Period | Average/ Day | Change from FY24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY 2024 | 277,913 | 366 | 759 | ||
| FY 2025: | |||||
| 2025-02-03 | Oct 1-Jan 25 | 82,093 | 117 | 702 | |
| 2025-02-03 | Jan 26-31 | 6,757 | 6 | 1,126 | 60.5% |
| 2025-02-14 | Feb 1-8 | 5,790 | 8 | 724 | 3.1% |
| 2025-02-27** | Feb 9-22 | 10,367 | 14 | 741 | 5.5% |
| 2025-03-14 | Feb 23-28 | 5,456 | 6 | 909 | 29.6% |
| 2025-03-14 | March 1 - 8 | 5,747 | 8 | 718 | 2.4% |
| Trump Cumulative Book-ins Following Arrest:January 26 - March 8 | 34,117 | 42 | 812 | 7.0% |
Lower Rate of ICE Arrests in March than Biden’s Record
This congressionally mandated series also tracks arrests of noncitizens who were initially booked into ICE detention facilities. In contrast to removals, figures are provided as monthly totals. TRAC compiles these numbers on its QuickFacts page and provides a detailed time series going back to October 2018 for these arrest figures.
As shown in Table B, during FY 2024 an average of 759 noncitizens each day were booked into ICE detention facilities following an arrest under Biden’s administration.[2] This does not count immigrants ICE had in custody who were not detained but were subject to close monitoring through its Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program. Under ATD an immigrant’s physical location was directly tracked through use of GPS ankle bracelets and other monitoring devices.[3]
Again, these congressionally mandated numbers did not exactly separate the pre and post-January period when Trump assumed office. Thus our ability to track Trump arrests started in January 26. During the initial period at the end of January (January 26-31), ICE book-ins following arrests jumped to a daily average of 1,126. However, ICE was not able to sustain this level so that in the following period ICE book-ins following arrests fell to just 724 per day. This was 4.7 percent below Biden’s daily arrests of 759 during FY 2024.
The pattern of arrest activity shows another uptick in arrests during the last week in February when daily arrests again climbed above Biden’s (909 daily arrests compared to Biden’s 759). But this has again fallen during the March 1-8 period to its lowest level of just 718 daily arrests or 5.4 percent below Biden’s numbers.
While results shown in Table B again suggest that the Trump administration is not able to sustain these higher arrests levels week after week, over the entire cumulative period of January 26 through March 8 and with a great deal of additional personnel from other agencies assisting ICE has managed to bring its average cumulative arrest daily average to 812 – a figure that is 7.0 percent higher than Biden’s record during FY 2024. But Trump’s arrest pattern is highly erratic since the most recent period in March actually showed its lowest daily average thus far – 5.4 percent lower than Biden’s.
Who Is Being Arrested and Deported?
The Trump administration continues to conceal most concrete details about its immigration enforcement activities – including where arrests are taking place, and who is being targeted and deported. It has publicized a few raids in specific locations, and chosen to publicize the arrest of named individuals as well as the removal of alleged categories of immigrants it wishes to make examples of. But a number of announced moves already taken by the Trump administration should make it easier to remove countless more immigrants in the future.[4] However, actually carrying out ever greater arrests and deportations may still pose significant challenges.
Thus, just what will actually occur remains uncertain. The need for public persistence seeking to document ICE’s actual enforcement efforts backed up with reliable numbers on arrests and removals remains of vital importance.
