Monday 30 December 2019

THEY FUCKING ROCKED IT

Shallow End  once again filled the house on Saturday night  with people who I mostly didn't know, and rocked the shit out of it also.
Super heavy , catchy, short , riff-laden songs will stick to your head for days . Get their cassette. No argument, no nothing . Just get it . I'm just surprised they're not bigger than what they are.

The other bands were Wolf Rider ( didn't catch them ) , The October Crisis with twists and turns you won't expect, and a guitar player who is nothing short of phenomenal , and Parasitic Twin , who are also heavy as fuck , and leaning way more towards the metal side of things.

You probably missed it . Too bad.

No photo description available.

Saturday 28 December 2019

ARE YOU REALLY SURPRISED ?

I've said all along that the amerikkkans helped isis in order to fight Assad in Syria, despite their lying rhetoric to the contrary . Fucking hypocritical motherfuckers.

The Caliphate Project, Made in America. Declassified U.S. Government Documents Confirm the US Supported the Creation of ISIS

 6347 
  454  22 
 
  6874
Global Research Editor’s Note:
First published in May 2015, this article reveals not only that the ISIS is a creation of US intelligence, it  also confirms that the Caliphate Project was designed in Washington.
See Screenshots Below from the title page as well as excerpts:
“… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime …. ” (Washington Blog, see below)
October 26, 2019
Judicial Watch has – for many years – obtained sensitive U.S. government documents through freedom of information requests and lawsuits.
The government just produced documents to Judicial Watch in response to a freedom of information suit which show that the West has long supported ISIS.   The documents were written by the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency on August 12, 2012 … years before ISIS burst onto the world stage.
Here are screenshots from the documents. We have highlighted the relevant parts in yellow:
Why is this important? It shows that extreme Muslim terrorists – salafists, Muslims Brotherhood, and AQI (i.e. Al Qaeda in Iraq) – have always been the “major forces driving the insurgency in Syria.”
This verifies what the alternative media has been saying for years: there aren’t any moderate rebels in Syria (and see thisthis and this).
The newly-declassified document continues:
Yes, you read that correctly:
… there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist Principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime ….
In other words, the powers supporting the Syrian opposition – the West, our Gulf allies, and Turkey wanted an Islamic caliphate in order to challenge Syrian president Assad.
Sure, top U.S. generals – and vice president Vice President Joe Biden – have said that America’s closest allies support ISIS.  And mainstream American media have called for direct support of ISIS.
But the declassified DIA documents show that the U.S. and the West supported ISIS at its inception … as a way to isolate the Syrian government.  And see this.
This is a big deal.  A former British Army and Metropolitan Police counter-terrorism intelligence officer and a former MI5 officer confirm that the newly-released documents are a smoking gun.
This is a train wreck long in the making.

Friday 27 December 2019

THEY WILL LOSE

It's a continuous process, with the u.s. government telling lie after lie about what they're doing in other countries and also about what "progress" they're making, which is not happening at all. They are losing the war in Afghanistan, which is why they're now willing to negotiate with "terrorists" and wouldn't before.
Read this please :

editorial_6.jpg

FCN3912P16a.jpg

President Trump has lied so regularly and gas lit the American public so often that talk of lies barely raise an eyebrow at times. Lying seems to be the order of the day. But recent revelations about the war in Afghanistan uncovered by the Washington Post prove once again that lying and misleading is a core part of the way the American government operates. And, it doesn’t matter who is in the White House.
According to recent coverage in the Post, based on thousands of pages of documents, notes, interviews and reports, “senior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan throughout the 18-year campaign, making rosy pronouncements they knew to be false and hiding unmistakable evidence the war had become unwinnable.”
The war in Afghanistan is now the longest U.S. war, costing thousands of lives and a trillion dollars. Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump knew the truth and have failed to tell the truth. It took the Post three years to get documents and truths through filing a Freedom of Information Act request and engaging in court battles.
“Since 2001, more than 775,000 U.S. troops have deployed to Afghanistan, many repeatedly. Of those, 2,300 died there and 20,589 were wounded in action,” the Post reported.
As lives were being lost on the American side and the Afghan side, U.S. military officials and advisors were lost. 
“ ‘We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan—we didn’t know what we were doing,’ Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015. He added: ‘What are we trying to do here? We didn’t have the foggiest notion of what we were undertaking,’ ” the Post reported Dec. 9.
“ ‘If the American people knew the magnitude of this dysfunction ... 2,400 lives lost,’ Lute added, blaming the deaths of U.S. military personnel on bureaucratic breakdowns among Congress, the Pentagon and the State Department. ‘Who will say this was in vain?’ ”
“ ‘What did we get for this $1 trillion effort? Was it worth $1 trillion?’ Jeffrey Eggers, a retired Navy SEAL and White House staffer for Bush and Obama, told government interviewers. He added, ‘After the killing of Osama bin Laden, I said that Osama was probably laughing in his watery grave considering how much we have spent on Afghanistan.’ 
“At the outset, for instance, the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan had a clear, stated objective—to retaliate against al-Qaeda and prevent a repeat of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.”
The Post observed that “as the war dragged on, the goals and mission kept changing and a lack of faith in the U.S. strategy took root inside the Pentagon, the White House and the State Department. Fundamental disagreements went unresolved. Some U.S. officials wanted to use the war to turn Afghanistan into a democracy. Others wanted to transform Afghan culture and elevate women’s rights. Still others wanted to reshape the regional balance of power among Pakistan, India, Iran and Russia. ‘With the AfPak strategy there was a present under the Christmas tree for everyone,’ an unidentified U.S. official told government interviewers in 2015. ‘By the time you were finished you had so many priorities and aspirations it was like no strategy at all.’ ”
From the beginning of the Afghan War and the war on Iraq that preceded it, one man has been a voice of caution for all three presidents and that man is the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam. 
He has warned America against her insatiable appetite for oil, her desire to destroy Islam, drive to institute regime change in the Middle East, her unbridled and unbalanced support for Israel and her love of war.
“America has been spared what other nations and people live with daily when their nations are racked with civil war, civil strife. And this nation has been involved in the destruction of other nations and the bombing and destroying of other capital cities,” said Min. Farrakhan in his Saviours’ Day 2002 message “Healing the Wounds to Bring About a Universal Family” in Los Angeles.
“America, a mystery Babylon, but the Scripture says: ‘Babylon is fallen, is fallen.’ Why is she fallen? It is because she has become a habitation of devils and a hole for every unclean and hateful bird, a cage. What does that have to do with great America? Is America going to fulfill her destiny as the foundation of the Kingdom of God on Earth, or is America going to fulfill prophecy? Not a good prophecy, but a prophecy that America would be like ancient Egypt, like ancient Rome, like ancient Babylon, like ancient Sodom and Gomorrah. America does not have to go that way. America can be America the Beautiful, but she must have a good shepherd. The leadership of America can either take America to hell or can lead America out of this ugliness and make America good … .”
But change for America must be rooted in truth and actions that reflect respect for the nations of the earth and love of freedoms that the United States constantly touts. She can no longer bully or deceive nations and is creating enemies abroad and distrust and anger at home. Lies and war will not save America and the debacle in Afghanistan proves it. Still these failures may not be enough to steer a nation off of a path that could mean its ultimate doom.

Monday 23 December 2019

REASON ENOUGH

This article should be reason enough to propel anyone into action against this system in general and fuckface trump in particular .
Life means nothing to them , despite their tired fucking rhetoric.

Locking Children in Metal Cages—The Fascist Regime Expanding Its Ability to Torture Immigrant Kids:
This Nightmare Must End!

 | revcom.us

An infant lying face down in the Rio Grande, dead in the arms of her father. Crying, hungry children locked in metal cages. Pregnant young women penned in frigid concentration camps that line the U.S.-Mexico border. Impoverished people traversing Mexico in caravans, being met at a border bristling with weaponry, and heavily armed military and police.
For the past several years the news has been filled with heartrending images of people who risk everything to try to make it to the U.S. border. The lives of millions of people are in upheaval and life-threatening crisis. What is driving people to risk everything to try to make their way across Mexico to the U.S.? Trump has snarled that the U.S. is under “invasion” by immigrants from Central America and Mexico trying to “break into” the U.S. Accounts in the major media always stay on the surface, speaking of the poverty and gang violence that plagues the countries of Central America, but never getting at the roots and sources of those conditions.

A Cascade of Horrors, Made in America

The reality is that for decades the U.S. has inflicted a cascade of unending horrors upon the people of Central America.
During the 1980s and 1990s, the U.S., under Democratic and Republican leadership, funded, directed, and waged counter-revolutionary, genocidal wars in GuatemalaEl Salvador, and Honduras. Hundreds of thousands of people were murdered in these wars, millions of others were impoverished and displaced. In the years since the U.S. has orchestrated coups and imposed punishing “trade agreements” on these countries that devastated farming and made people’s very survival dependent on expensive exports from the U.S. The U.S. supports and funds Central American governments that preside with unchecked brutality over some of the most violent and unequal societies on earth.
Mexico and Central America are in great crisis and turmoil. Millions of people are desperately impoverished. They are plagued by violence from the police and militaries of their countries, and from criminal gangs that have sprung up on the soil created by imperialism and are often in league with the governments. Environmental destruction driven by capitalism-imperialism has ruined much of the remaining farmland.
The refugee crisis and the horror at the border was created by imperialism and the dynamics driving it will only get worse in the years to come.
Besides the sheer inhumanity of the horror being done to innocent and desperate people, the fact that this suffering is absolutely unnecessary makes it all the more infuriating. The Constitution for the New Socialist Republic in North America, authored by Bob Avakian, states clearly that “The orientation of the New Socialist Republic in North America is to welcome immigrants from all over the world who have a sincere desire to contribute to the goals and objectives of this Republic, as set forth in this Constitution and in laws and policies which are established and enacted in accordance with this Constitution.” Go here to read more on the policy of the revolution; and go here to find out more about why this revolution is necessary and how it could be made. (Watch the film WHY WE NEED AN ACTUAL REVOLUTION AND HOW WE CAN REALLY MAKE REVOLUTION, a speech by Bob Avakian.)

Laying the Legal Groundwork, Preparing the Concentration Camps

The Democratic president Barack Obama deported more people than any president ever, and actually set up the system of detaining families. And the liberal New York Times has said that every president, of whatever party, will always be deporter-in-chief. Whether people are allowed into this imperialist country has nothing to do with concerns about humanity, but only about what benefits this system. Nobody who sits atop this system, Republican or Democrat, has any answer to the horrors of the lopsided world that it has created and must perpetuate.
But the fascist answer of the Trump/Pence regime has been taking the atrocities inflicted on the peoples of these countries to entirely new levels of criminality. It is preparing to massively expand and extend its torture of immigrant children and youth within the U.S. in the name of “defending America’s borders,” and “ending catch and release.”
For over a year the regime has been systematically pushing ahead with plans to arrest, imprison, and deport tens of thousands of immigrant families, including infants and children. In the past month, those efforts have gone into high gear. The government’s own data show that this year 69,550 migrant children were held in U.S. custody at some point, an all-time high. Now the fascist juggernaut is preparing, and in fact already beginning to implement, roundups in this country that could escalate rapidly and enormously. And they are preparing for global upheaval caused by crisis in the capitalist-imperialist system that compels countless more desperate people to seek refuge in this country.
In June 2018 Trump’s Department of Homeland Security announced its intention to quintuple the capacity of its concentration camps for immigrant children. About a week later Trump’s “Justice” Department (DOJ) petitioned a federal court to allow children to be held in detention for longer than 20 days, and to be kept in facilities that don’t require state licensing. In addition, at about the same time, the Pentagon began evaluating at least four military bases for use as “sites to house as many as 20,000 unaccompanied immigrant children, including three in Texas and a fourth in Arkansas,” as the El Paso Times reported.
Last month a federal judge rejected arguments by Trump’s lawyers that would have put an end to a 20-year-old agreement intended to prevent the government from imprisoning children and their families indefinitely. But four things are important to understand about this. One, Trump’s DOJ is fighting the ruling, in a case that could soon go to a Supreme Court packed with fascists that will very likely decide in favor of his regime, or taken to another of the many courts now dominated by right wing judges appointed by Trump (or Bush before him). Two, the government is expanding its ability to hold tens of thousands more immigrants, including children, with or without a court decision. Three, Trump has vowed to round up “millions” of immigrants, and in fact ICE has already begun extensive arrests and deportations of immigrants across the country. And four, as the Associated Press reported on November 12, 2019, “About 4,000 [immigrant children] are still in government custody, some in large, impersonal shelters. And more arrive every week.”

Institutionalized Torture

Separation of children and infants from their parents is a universally recognized form of torture. It can cause permanent brain damage to children. Dr. Claire McCarthy wrote in the journal Harvard Health Publishing that “there is an important scientific fact that we need to be aware of as the political drama at the border unfolds: when children are separated from their parents, they can be damaged for the rest of their lives.” Dr. McCarthy explained how children forcibly separated from their parents are inflicted with emotional and physical traumas and stresses that not only can trigger severe depression and other psychological damages, but harm to the body’s organs and functions. She concluded, “[W]hat is happening at the border goes beyond using children as pawns. The science is clear. We are literally ruining their lives.... This is more than wrong. It’s unconscionable.”
The conditions at the concentration camps where children have been held are squalid, disease infested, and overcrowded. A lawyer who spent about a week at a concentration camp in Dilley, Texas, this summer reported in The Nation that “Nearly every one of the almost 500 people that I saw in the detention center was sick.... [A]gents take them in their wet clothes, at first, to the ‘hielera,’ the ‘icebox,’ a refrigerated building ... where they had to try to sleep on the concrete floor or sit on concrete benches under mylar blankets, prodded by agents all night and day, deliberately kept awake. Bathroom breaks are frequently not granted, or not in time, so both women and children often soil themselves.... [T]wo bologna sandwiches for four days, for a mother and two children, was standard. Sometimes they missed food for a day. Sickness was not treated.... After the Hielera, they went to the ‘perrera’, or doghouse, a place where families were put in cages, cyclone fencing between them as though they were animals.”
The standards that institutionalize this sadistic abuse of infants, children, and young women are not brutal enough to “send the message” the fascists want. Lawsuits they’ve filed, and a law they are putting before Congress, would remove any level of government oversight to the concentration camps they intend to fill.
Many protests have been launched against the imprisonment of children across the country, and future protests are planned. Lawyers and medical professionals have provided support for the immigrants. All efforts like these are important—but much, much more is needed. The atrocities continue, and they are about to get far worse. They need to be STOPPED!

The Time to Act Is NOW

Relentless attacks on immigrants are a battering ram through which the Trump/Pence regime is advancing and consolidating its entire fascist program. Fighting to put an end to the horrors this regime is already inflicting on immigrants, and the even greater ones it is preparing, must be part of the one unifying demand #OUTNOW!
Now is the time, including over these holidays when the contradiction of families separated and children locked in cages is all the more glaring, to step into this fight and to struggle with others to do the same. Print off and spread this article, as well as the fact sheet on this website. And join with Refuse Fascism in the month of activities it has called for this January.

Friday 20 December 2019

CAST AWAY ILLUSIONS

This is the wrong time to try and be conciliatory towards  fuckface trump and everyone like him. They will use your weakness to manipulate and deceive you, because there is no compromising with these fascists.
Read :

On the Impeachment of Trump, the Volatile Situation, and the Continued Need for Massive Nonviolent Action “From Below” to Drive Him and the Entire Regime Out

 | revcom.us

On Wednesday night, the House of Representatives impeached Donald Trump.  This sets up a trial in the Senate, at which there will be a debate over whether to remove Trump from the presidency.  While this has been informally set for January, last night House Speaker Nancy Pelosi indicated this was not certain.
The impeachment of a U.S. president is extraordinary.  Moves to impeach have only happened three times previous to this.  In two cases, the president was acquitted and stayed in office; in one, the case of Nixon, he resigned before the formal vote on impeachment was taken.  Such moves reflect deep splits within the ruling class. 
The impeachment vote has not diminished the uncertainty of the situation, nor still less the need for massive, sustained, nonviolent action to drive out the entire Trump/Pence fascist regime.  In this light, two points:
First, the crucial truth that we have returned to since early 2017 takes on heightened importance:
The Democrats, along with the New York Times and the Washington Post, etc., are seeking to resolve the crisis with the Trump presidency on the terms of this system, and in the interests of the ruling class of this system, which they represent. We, the masses of people, must go all out, and mobilize ourselves in the millions, to resolve this in our interests, in the interests of humanity, which are fundamentally different from and opposed to those of the ruling class.
This, of course, does not mean that the struggle among the powers that be is irrelevant or unimportant; rather, the way to understand and approach this (and this is a point that must also be repeatedly driven home to people, including through necessary struggle, waged well) is in terms of how it relates to, and what openings it can provide for, “the struggle from below”—for the mobilization of masses of people around the demand that the whole regime must gobecause of its fascist nature and actions and what the stakes are for humanity.
Second, in addition, given the volatility and potential political explosiveness of this situation, we want to call our readers’ attention to the following crucial passage on the method of the new communism in approaching any situation:
Next I want to talk about “Enriched What Is To Be Done-ism” and its role in building a revolutionary and communist movement. I want to begin by reviewing some important points relating to the whole orientation and strategic approach of “hastening while awaiting” the development of a revolutionary situation in a country like the U.S.
I spoke earlier about the outlook and approach of revisionist “determinist realism”[16] which, among other things, involves a passive approach to objective reality (or necessity), which sees the objective factor as purely objective—and purely “external,” if you will—and doesn’t grasp the living dialectical relation between the objective and subjective factors and the ability of the latter (the subjective factor—the conscious actions of people) to react back on and to transform the former (the objective factor—the objective conditions). In other words, this “determinist realism” doesn’t grasp the essential orientation, and possibility, of transforming necessity into freedom. It doesn’t really, or fully, grasp the contradictoriness of all of reality, including the necessity that one is confronted with at any given time. So, one of the essential features of “determinist realism” is that it dismisses as “voluntarism” any dialectical grasp of the relation between the subjective and objective factors, and sees things in very linear, undifferentiated ways, as essentially uniform and without contradiction, rather than in a living and dynamic and moving and changing way.
Of course, it is necessary not to fall into voluntarism. There are many different ways in which such voluntarism can be expressed, leading to various kinds of (usually “ultra-left”) errors and deviations, if you will—including in the form of giving in to infantilist or adventurist impulses—all of which is also extremely harmful. But—particularly in a protracted or prolonged situation in which the objective conditions for revolution (that is, for the all-out struggle to seize power) have not yet emerged—by far the much greater danger, and one that is reinforced by this objective situation, is this kind of determinist realism which doesn’t grasp correctly the dialectical relation between the objective and subjective factors, and sees them in static, undialectical, and unchanging terms.
It is true that we cannot, by our mere will, or even merely by our actions themselves, transform the objective conditions in a qualitative sense—into a revolutionary situation. This cannot be done merely by our operating on, or reacting back on, the objective conditions through our conscious initiative. On the other hand, once again a phrase from Lenin has important application here. With regard to the labor aristocracy—the sections of the working class in imperialist countries which are, to no small extent, bribed from the spoils of imperialist exploitation and plunder throughout the world, and particularly in the colonies—Lenin made the point that nobody can say with certainty where these more “bourgeoisified” sections of the working class are going to line up in the event of the revolution—which parts of them are going to be with the revolution when the ultimate showdown comes, and which are going to go with the counter-revolution—nobody can say exactly how that is going to fall out, Lenin insisted. And applying this same principle, we can say that nobody can say exactly what the conscious initiative of the revolutionaries might be capable of producing, in reacting upon the objective situation at any given time—in part because nobody can predict all the other things that all the different forces in the world will be doing. Nobody’s understanding can encompass all that at a given time. We can identify trends and patterns, but there is the role of accident as well as the role of causality. And there is the fact that, although changes in what’s objective for us won’t come entirely, or perhaps not even mainly, through our “working on” the objective conditions (in some direct, one-to-one sense), nevertheless our “working on” them can bring about certain changes within a given framework of objective conditions and—in conjunction with and as part of a “mix,” together with many other elements, including other forces acting on the objective situation from their own viewpoints—this can, under certain circumstances, be part of the coming together of factors which does result in a qualitative change. And, again, it is important to emphasize that nobody can know exactly how all that will work out.
Revolution is not made by “formulas,” or by acting in accordance with stereotypical notions and preconceptions—it is a much more living, rich, and complex process than that. But it is an essential characteristic of revisionism (phony communism which has replaced a revolutionary orientation with a gradualist, and ultimately reformist one) to decide and declare that until some deus ex machina—some god-like EXTERNAL FACTOR—intervenes, there can be no essential change in the objective conditions and the most we can do, at any point, is to accept the given framework and work within it, rather than (as we have very correctly formulated it) constantly straining against the limits of the objective framework and seeking to transform the objective conditions to the maximum degree possible at any given time, always being tense to the possibility of different things coming together which bring about (or make possible the bringing about of) an actual qualitative rupture and leap in the objective situation.
So that is a point of basic orientation in terms of applying materialism, and dialectics, in hastening while awaiting the emergence of a revolutionary situation. It’s not just that, in some abstract moral sense, it’s better to hasten than just await—though, of course, it is—but this has to do with a dynamic understanding of the motion and development of material reality and the interpenetration of different contradictions, and the truth that, as Lenin emphasized, all boundaries in nature and society, while real, are conditional and relative, not absolute. (Mao also emphasized this same basic principle in pointing out that, since the range of things is vast and things are interconnected, what’s universal in one context is particular in another.) The application of this principle to what is being discussed here underlines that it is only relatively, and not absolutely, that the objective conditions are “objective” for us—they are, but not in absolute terms. And, along with this, what is external to a given situation can become internal, as a result of the motion—and changes that are brought about through the motion—of contradictions. So, if you are looking at things only in a linear way, then you only see the possibilities that are straight ahead—you have a kind of blinders on. On the other hand, if you have a correct, dialectical materialist approach, you recognize that many things can happen that are unanticipated, and you have to be constantly tense to that possibility while consistently working to transform necessity into freedom. So, again, that is a basic point of orientation.
[16] The subject of “determinist realism” is spoken to in part 1: “Beyond the Narrow Horizon of Bourgeois Right”—available at revcom.us—and, in the serialization of part 1, is found in “Marxism as a Science—In Opposition to Mechanical Materialism, Idealism and Religiosity,” in Revolution #109, Nov. 18, 2007. [back]
As the New Year approaches: cast away illusions, prepare for struggle.

Wednesday 18 December 2019

GAMES AND MANIPULATION

Just like obama before him, fuckface trump is playing games with troop numbers and manipulating them to hide the facts.
The u.s.a. is losing the war in Afghanistan, they never were winning, and despite their lies and rhetoric about "negotiating with terrorists ", they are trying to do just that with the taliban, but without any serious leverage because they are fucking losing .
It's like this , see :


Troop “Reduction” in Afghanistan!

Region: 
In-depth Report: 
 0 
  0  0 
 
  New
Trump was elected president in 2016 partly because he railed against America’s wasteful wars.  So, what did his advisers talk him into?  A mini-surge of troops to Afghanistan.  I still recall the odd news of Trump being shown photos of Afghan women in skirts (vintage 1972) to convince him that westernization and modernization of Afghanistan was possible.
Several thousand additional U.S. troops were sent to Afghanistan in 2017, predictably achieving nothing of note.  A little more than two years later, we have another item of “big” news today, according to CNN:
The Trump Administration is preparing to announce a long-awaited reduction of US troops in Afghanistan, a senior administration official confirmed to CNN. There are between 12,000 and 13,000 US troops in the country right now, and the US has maintained a solid presence throughout the 18-year war in the area. This drawdown would remove up to 4,000 troops, with more possible reductions in the future, the official said. That matches the claim Trump made on Fox News Radio in August that his administration would take the number “down to 8,600.” The reduction comes at the same time the US is restarting peace talks with the Taliban, and some worry the troop drawdown could be seen as a concession to the terrorist group.
Where to begin with this CNN snippet?
  1.  The “reduction” is not a reduction but a return to previous troop levels at the end of the Obama administration.
  2. The U.S. “has maintained a solid presence”?  Good god.  You’d never know about all the bombing, droning, and killing the U.S. has done over the last 18+ years.  Or is that the “solid presence” we’ve been maintaining?
  3. The troop “drawdown” as a “concession” to the Taliban?  Guess what: The Taliban aren’t going anywhere, and they’re winning.  A few thousand U.S. troops, either as a “plus-up” or “drawdown,” have had and will have no impact on the reality on the ground.
Sometimes I don’t know whether to laugh, cry, or do both.  Perhaps my dad put it best: “We laugh to hide the tears.”
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc